汉代地方城市组群演变研究——以鲁中南地区为例

以鲁中南地区为例,根据考古资料和实地调研整理两汉时期的城市群。根据城市性质,分为郡县邑城和诸侯国两个体系,紧扣权利运行机制,阐释两个城市体系的发展变化过程,揭示由诸侯国各自为政到大一统的城市组群演变过程。此外,针对鲁中南城市组群特征进行分区研究,并比较春秋战国时期建城热潮与西汉大量城市建设间的异同,总结汉代城市营建原则。     

新形势下煤炭企业人力资源开发与利用

从煤炭企业人力资源开发和利用的角度,指出了有效开展人才多通道职业发展机制对企业发展的重要性和必要性,详细分析了当前企业在人力资源开发和利用方面存在的新情况、新问题,并有针对性地提出了人才多通道职业发展机制的途径、目的、措施及相关对策。     

探讨我国管道区域化运行维护的实现路径

北美管道具有世界上最先进的油气管网体系,区域化运行维护是北美管道的突出特点,也是国内对标学习的方向。我国与国外管道企业区域化运行维护模式存在的差异主要体现在管网整体能力、政府管理与法律法规、企业定位、管道调控运行模式、管道建设质量、社会依托环境等方面的不同。分析当前国内管道企业实行区域化运行维护中出现的问题,从以下7个方面探寻未来我国推进区域化运行维护模式的路径:破除观念束缚,坚定发展信心;加快管网建设,提升抗风险能力;争取上级的理解,获得必要支持;调控集中管理,优化基层工作;优化岗位设置,提升员工素质;改进机关作风,整合信息系统;配套激励措施,稳定员工队伍。     

跨界高端颠覆性创新模式研究：理论与案例验证

克里斯坦森的颠覆性创新理论旨在解释具有很强技术创新能力的企业顷刻间衰败的颠覆性现象。然而，现有颠覆性创新理论认为，颠覆性创新都是低端的，难以解释智能手机、固态硬盘等高端颠覆现象。通过研究固态硬盘对机械硬盘高端颠覆的案例发现：①导致行业领先企业市场地位更替的新技术，都应该被视为是颠覆性创新，而不应以技术是否具有低端属性作为判断依据；②现有理论认为，颠覆性技术首先来源于行业内部，忽略了技术创新的行业相对性，一个行业的既有技术可能对其它行业产生颠覆性效应；③外部行业企业通过外部技术对原有行业进行颠覆，这种颠覆往往表现为高端颠覆。     

Different forms of corporate philanthropy,different effects: A multilevel analysis

This study investigates how different types of corporate philanthropy impact employees' life satisfaction. Grounded in signaling theory, we explore and clarify the nuances among three types of corporate philanthropy values: the absolute value of corporate philanthropy, the value of a firm's corporate philanthropy relative to its past level, and the value of corporate philanthropy relative to the firm size. Results of multilevel analyses on a large scale sample with 218 firms and 2,261 employees at two time points reveal that: the absolute value of corporate philanthropy positively influences employees' life satisfaction; the value of a firm's corporate philanthropy relative to its past philanthropy negatively impacts employees’ life satisfaction; and the value of corporate philanthropy relative to the firm size positively affects employees' life satisfaction. The results indicate that the influences of corporate philanthropy on employees' life satisfaction vary depending on the evaluation benchmarks. Firms may benefit by taking their size and past philanthropy into consideration when making corporate philanthropy investment decisions.     

Security regulations,access to capital markets,and firm performance: Evidence from China

This study explores the cost of security regulations in China, where firms are required to meet a certain profitability benchmark before applying for permission to raise more equity via secondary equity offerings (SEOs). Using a difference-in-differences setting, we show that firms affected by the regulation (i.e., firms with high external financing demands (EFD) but profitability lower than the regulatory requirement) significantly underperform their counterparts, while unaffected firms do not. The affected firms’ performance decline increases (decreases) when the requirement of profitability is more (less) restricted. Consistently, the three-day cumulative abnormal return (CAR) of firms with high EFD is significantly negative (positive) when the regulation is tightened (loosened). Our study provides evidence on how the cost of regulation affects companies that have growth opportunities.     

高管团队异质性、团队冲突与企业绿色绩效——差异化CEO领导风格调节下的整合分析框架

基于高阶梯队等理论，从高层管理团队异质性等要素整合分析视角切入，在探讨高层管理团队驱动企业绿色绩效作用机制的基础上，尝试构建差异化CEO领导风格调节下高管团队（TMT）异质性、团队冲突与企业绿色绩效的理论模型；通过层次回归分析、Bootstrap等方法实证检验异质性高层管理团队的作用机理和边界。研究结果显示：①TMT异质性、任务冲突能显著提升企业绿色绩效，且任务冲突在TMT异质性与企业绿色绩效的关系中起部分中介效应，而关系冲突显著降低企业绿色绩效。多元化构成的高层管理团队拥有更多差异化思想，这些观点通过高层管理团队成员不断分析整合后作用于绿色绩效，而成员间“对人不对事”的关系冲突会弱化该过程，进而对绿色绩效产生负向影响；②变革型CEO领导风格负向调节任务冲突与企业绿色绩效的关系，表明CEO适度简政放权，指导、关怀和保障高管团队成员充分表达观点非常重要。交易型CEO领导风格负向调节关系冲突与企业绿色绩效的关系，说明CEO通过奖惩激励，降低高层管理团队情绪冲突，提升团队凝聚，是推动绿色转型的重要举措。     

确定采矿及建筑施工排水水资源费征收标准的理论方法

在分析排水水资源费的本质、排水与取水水资源费确定方法异同点的基础上,提出理论上排水水资源费征收标准的2种确定方法,即直接利用取水水资源费征收标准进行修正的方法和排水水资源费的边际机会成本法。同时分析目前我国地方省份采矿及建筑施工排水水资源费征收标准的特点,并利用提出的2种排水水资源费征收标准的确定方法分析产生这些特点的原因,论证有些地方省份排水水资源费征收标准高于取水水资源费征收标准的缘由。     

Market Discipline and Deposit Guarantee: Evidence from Australian Banks

This study examines depositor market discipline of Australian banks and its interaction with the 2008 deposit and wholesale funding guarantee. Prior to 2008 market discipline is found for Australian‐incorporated banks. Depositors did not distinguish between major and small banks, but some differences in the degree of market discipline were found for foreign bank subsidiaries. Following the introduction of the 2008 guarantees, market discipline was reduced except for nonhousehold depositors at banks that did not access the wholesale guarantee. Market discipline is also evidenced at foreign bank branches, but weaker for those accessing the wholesale guarantee.